• Solutions
  • Tools
  • App Development
  • News & Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Testimonials
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog
PostsRSS Feed
  • Home
  • Dynamic Processes
  • Group Decision System
  • Concept Mapping
  • Frontier Analysis
  • Web Surveys

Group Decision System

Prism’s group decision support system is capable of accelerating and improving decision-making in unprecedented ways.

All meeting participants — not just those who are most vocal – use radio response keypads to assess options. Power and turf are removed from the room. Instant feedback demonstrates clearly where there is agreement and where there is disagreement. Undercurrents within the meeting are exposed and objectively displayed.

In short, the group’s decision-making is ordered, rational and collegial. Consensus is deeper. The whole process is accelerated.

How it works


Meeting participants — whether creating a strategic plan, solving a complex problem, negotiating an agreement, designing an alliance, or creating a new product — use our dynamic group processes to generate options. They then assess those options anonymously using radio response keypads in a variety of ways:

  • 1 to n user defined scale
  • Paired comparison
  • Strategic profile
  • Multiple criteria matrix
  • Systems analysis matrix

The group’s vote results are instantly displayed. For example, a typical strategic planning session produces a Strategy Profile. In this example, the client group first completed a paired comparison analysis to force rank nine strategies in terms of their importance to great success (vertical axis). Second, they assessed how well the organization is currently performing each strategy (horizontal axis). Third, they identified whether the strategy is old (square) or new (circle). To interpret these vote results, see our discussion of strategic profiling.

The strategic profile can also be disaggregated by demographic sub-groups. (See Strategy Profile disaggregated by “Management” and “Board”.) This capability is an extremely powerful way to deepen organizational learning and create alignment, as all groups are able to see explicitly where they align or differ. Where subgroups align, there is basis for agreement and immediate action. Where they differ, the disaggregated results facilitate consensus building by forcing further exchange of information and discussion of basic assumptions.

Finally, any axis can be displayed as a bar chart to facilitate understanding and discussion.

Recent Blog Posts

  • NoDropouts.org features CohortTracker™
  • CohortTracker™ early warning system goes live in New York
  • Personal transformation and New Year’s resolutions
  • Screen cast introduces CohortTracker™
  • When spreadsheets go bad
  • CohortTracker™ early warning system

Blog Subscription

Subscribe to receive blog posts via email.
 

  • Recent Tweets

    • RT @knowinnovation: The demise of group brainstorming, once again, has been exaggerated: http://t.co/39r3PNts about 2 days ago
    • Appalling state of IT in New York: 46000 public comments submitted on paper now being scanned http://t.co/yH6qLZ4e? #tech about 2 days ago
    • RT @TheAtlantic: Your definitive, data-driven guide to being better at Twitter http://t.co/aP1lexF2 about 4 days ago
Follow @PrismDecision

Blog Topics

  • Agile software
  • All blog posts
  • Consensus-building
  • Creativity & problem solving
  • Decision-making
  • How do you decide
  • K-12 education
  • News
  • Personal productivity
  • Simply fascinating
  • Strategic planning
  • Top 5 reader favorites

Collaborators

  • Decision Mechanics Limited
  • Idea Sciences, Inc.
  • Maplegate Technologies, LLC
  • New & Improved, LLC
  • Westwood International

Copyright © 2005-2011, Prism Decision Systems, LLC
Sean Brady - 607-771-5411
Email: Sean.Brady@PrismDecision.com

Maintained and Hosted by Maplegate Technologies, LLC Site design by KL