• Solutions
  • Tools
  • About
  • App Development
  • News & Papers
  • Case Studies
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
PostsRSS Feed
  • Home
  • Strategic Planning
  • School Improvement Planning
  • school benchmarking.com
  • Decision Support
  • Shared Decision-Making
  • Strategic Resource Allocation
  • Needs Assessments
  • Training
  • Alliance Management

Strategic Resource Allocation

Prism’s systems analysis matrix is an efficient and powerful tool for aligning resources with newly prioritized strategy. The matrix is used after a planning team completes the strategic “Opportunity Profile”.

Newly weighted strategies are dropped across columns at the top of the matrix. The organization’s functions and their costs are listed down the side. The planning team then uses Prism’s group decision support system to assess the degree to which each function contributes to each strategy on a 1 to 9 scale. After the group votes each cell, a histogram shows the degree of agreement. If there is disagreement, the group discusses and revotes the cell.

Once voting is complete, the matrix calculates the relative worth of each function. The average raw score in each cell is multiplied by strategy weight. The sum of the weighted scores across each row shows the relative worth of each function in terms of its contribution to the organization’s total set of strategies.

The matrix also calculates the relative value of each function by subtracting its cost from its worth. A positive value suggests that a function is worth more than it costs. A negative value suggests that the function costs more than it is worth, inviting it to better contribute to the entire set of strategies and increase its worth. Or it suggests a need to reallocate resources.


Finally, the matrix assesses the gap between the current and required resources to implement each strategy. The sum of the raw scores in each column equals the organization’s potential contribution to implement that column’s strategy. This organization “effort” score minus strategy weight displays resource misalignment or “opportunity”. A negative suggests the organization’s total resources are not aligned to implement the strategy. A positive suggests the organization may be over-resourced to implement the strategy – another opportunity to reallocate. If the value is close to zero, the organization is resourced appropriately to implement the strategy.

Sample case study: Strategic Resource Allocation with Prism

Recent Blog Posts

  • Managing a Cohort to Graduation
  • Are Too Many Options Bad For You?
  • The Monkey Business Illusion
  • The Antidote for America’s Creativity Crisis
  • Is America in a Creativity Crisis?
  • Lebron’s Decision-making Fallacy
  • Channel Your Inner Crayfish Brain
  • 98% Of All Statistics Are False

Blog Subscription

Subscribe to receive posts via email.
 

Blog Topics

  • All Blog Posts
  • High School Graduation
  • Insight in 60 Seconds
  • Processes
  • Tools
  • Top 5 Reader Favorites
  • Welcome

Client Login

  • Surveys
  • Downloads

Collaborators

  • Decision Mechanics, Ltd.
  • Idea Sciences, Inc.
  • Maplegate Technologies, LLC
  • New & Improved, LLC
  • Westwood International

 

Copyright © 2005-2010, Prism Decision Systems, LLC
Sean Brady - 607-771-5411
Email: Sean.Brady@PrismDecision.com

Maintained and Hosted by Maplegate Technologies, LLC Site design by KL